<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Currie, Donya</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mammography guidelines set off heated health debate</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Nation's Health</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010-12-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12-12</style></pages><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">39</style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">When the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force issued updated mammography recommendations at a key time in the national health reform debate, the fallout included accusations of rationing of care and renewed questions about when most women should be screened for breast cancer.Copyright The Nation’s Health, American Public Health Association</style></abstract></record></records></xml>