<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">McGill, Natalie</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Smokeless tobacco: No fire, but still bad for your health</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Nation's Health</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-10-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28-28</style></pages><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">44</style></volume><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></issue><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">When it comes to tobacco use, it isn’t uncommon to see plenty of warnings about the health risks of cigarette smoking. But another form of tobacco, smokeless tobacco, also carries risks, even without the spark of a lighter.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>