Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Healthy You
    • Job listings
    • Q&As
    • Special sections
  • Multimedia
    • Quiz
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • FAQs
    • Advertising
    • Subscriptions
    • For APHA members
    • Internships
    • Change of address
  • About
    • About The Nation's Health
    • Submissions
    • Permissions
    • Purchase articles
    • Join APHA
  • Contact us
    • Feedback
  • APHA
    • AJPH
    • NPHW

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The Nation's Health
  • APHA
    • AJPH
    • NPHW
  • My alerts
The Nation's Health

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Healthy You
    • Job listings
    • Q&As
    • Special sections
  • Multimedia
    • Quiz
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • FAQs
    • Advertising
    • Subscriptions
    • For APHA members
    • Internships
    • Change of address
  • About
    • About The Nation's Health
    • Submissions
    • Permissions
    • Purchase articles
    • Join APHA
  • Contact us
    • Feedback
  • Follow The Nation's Health on Twitter
  • Follow APHA on Twitter
  • Visit APHA on Facebook
  • Follow APHA on Youtube
  • Follow APHA on Instagram
  • Follow The Nation's Health RSS feeds
NewsWeb-only News

Online only: Vaginal birth after cesarean still a reasonable option, panel says

The Nation's Health May/June 2010, 40 (4) E16;

The way women give birth in the United States might soon change, if new recommendations are accepted. Advocating expanded delivery options, an independent panel of experts convened by the National Institutes of Health in March determined that giving birth vaginally after a previous cesarean delivery is a reasonable option for certain women.

The panel found that pregnant women who want to have a vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery find few clinicians and facilities willing to allow them to attempt such a birth, also known as a “trial of labor.” Moreover, many women — even those at low risk for complications — are not offered a trial of labor after a previous cesarean delivery even though it is a reasonable option for them. The panel urged that current guidelines discouraging the procedure be revisited, that malpractice concerns be addressed and that additional research be undertaken to better understand the medical and non-medical factors that influence decision-making for women with previous cesarean deliveries.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the cesarean rate in the United States climbed 53 percent between 1996 and 2007, reaching an all-time high of 32 percent in 2007. The current overall cesarean delivery rate in the United States is 31 percent, with less than 10 percent of women giving birth vaginally after a previous cesarean, down from 28 percent in 1996.

“Declining (vaginal births after cesarean) rates and increasing cesarean delivery rates over the last 15 years would seem to indicate that planned repeat cesarean delivery is preferable to a trial of labor,” said F. Gary Cunningham, MD, chair of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and chair of the consensus development panel. “But the currently available evidence suggests a very different picture: A trial of labor is worth considering and may be preferable for many women.”

A draft consensus statement released by the panel in March said a trial of labor is successful in nearly 75 percent of cases and maternal death is actually lower for women who have a trial of labor, regardless of whether they end up delivering vaginally or by cesarean. However, women who have an unsuccessful trial of labor and undergo a repeat cesarean delivery experience higher rates of illness than those who have a successful vaginal birth after cesarean.

For most of the 20th century, clinicians believed it was unsafe to give birth vaginally after a previous cesarean delivery, according to the consensus statement. But the cesarean rate began to fall after a consensus panel convened by NIH in 1980 questioned the necessity of routine repeat cesarean deliveries and outlined situations in which a vaginal procedure could be considered. As a result, from 1980 to 1996 the numbers of vaginal births after cesareans increased steadily. But acccording to the Coalition for Improving Maternity Services, cesarean rates across the nation began rising again in 1996 after the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists released new guidelines recommending that vaginal births after cesareans only be attempted in facilities equipped to respond to emergencies, with physicians immediately available to provide emergency care.

In its consensus statement, the independent panel urged clinicians to revisit the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendation, noting that two recent surveys of hospital administrators found that 30 percent of hospitals stopped offering a trial of labor or vaginal birth after a previous cesarean because they were unable to meet the organization’s recommendation.

The panel called for additional research to develop clear, evidence-based risk assessment tools to assist mothers and providers in the decision-making process from early pregnancy through delivery.

“There’s still a lot we don’t know about which women will be successful in having a (vaginal birth after cesarean), but we believe it’s essential that women’s desires and preferences be respected throughout the decision-making process,” Cunningham said.

To view the panel’s draft consensus statement, visit www.consensus.nih.gov.

  • Copyright The Nation’s Health, American Public Health Association
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Nation's Health: 40 (4)
The Nation's Health
Vol. 40, Issue 4
May/June 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)

Healthy You

Healthy You

Print
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article
We do not capture any email addresses.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Online only: Vaginal birth after cesarean still a reasonable option, panel says
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Nation's Health
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this item on The Nation's Health website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Online only: Vaginal birth after cesarean still a reasonable option, panel says
The Nation's Health May/June 2010, 40 (4) E16;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Online only: Vaginal birth after cesarean still a reasonable option, panel says
The Nation's Health May/June 2010, 40 (4) E16;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Top

More in this TOC Section

  • Newsmakers: May 2025
  • Newsmakers: April 2015
  • Newsmakers: February/March 2025
Show more Web-only News

Popular features

  • Healthy You
  • Special sections
  • Q&As
  • Quiz
  • Podcasts

FAQs

  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
  • For APHA members
  • Submissions
  • Change of address

APHA

  • Join APHA
  • Annual Meeting
  • NPHW
  • AJPH
  • Get Ready
  • Contact APHA
  • Privacy policy

© 2025 The Nation's Health

Powered by HighWire